QA Process and Strategy
What Is Stress Testing? Pushing Software Testing to its Limits
By Daniel Avila12 min readQA and Testing
QA Process and Strategy
A practical guide to designing QA process and acceptance testing strategy, for engineering leaders deciding how much testing rigor their team actually needs.
All 56 articles
Newest first · Page 2 of 7
By Daniel Avila12 min read
QA Process and Strategy
Positive & Negative Testing Compared: Strategies & Methods
By Pablo Chamorro12 min read
QA Process and Strategy
Load Testing: Defined, Tools & Best Practices
By Rocío Belfiore11 min read
QA Process and Strategy
Black Box Testing Defined: Advantages, Types & Tools
By Agustín Achille13 min read
QA Process and Strategy
Sanity Testing: Keeping Software Logic Intact
By Rocío Belfiore15 min read
QA Process and Strategy
Verification vs Validation: The Differences, Tools & Benefits
By Paul Azorin9 min read
QA Process and Strategy
Severity vs Priority: Bug Prioritization in Software Testing
By Federico Schwarzbock11 min read
QA Process and Strategy
Quality Control vs. Quality Assurance: Demystifying the Differences
By Daniel Avila9 min read
QA Process and Strategy
The Power of Regression Testing in QA
By Pablo Chamorro18 min readStart here
Software Testing Strategies: A Guide for Leaders
1 in 5 Software Projects Lack QA. That’s a Strategic Failure, Not a Hiring One
How Exploratory Testing Reveals Hidden Issues
How to Test Your MVP
Why Test Scripts Are Important for Quality Assurance
Manual QA Is Not Dying, Not Even in the Era of AI. Here’s WhyAbout this topic
This section covers how engineering teams build a QA process that holds up under real release pressure, not just a checklist for an audit. We write about acceptance testing because it is the step where most teams either catch what actually matters or let through a regression that costs support a bad week. The articles here come from people who have run test cycles, argued over severity labels, and shipped fixes against a deadline. If you are deciding how much process your team actually needs, start here.
We cover the distinction between checking that software was built correctly and checking it solves the right problem, which shapes verification and validation practices. Bug triage gets separate treatment too, since teams that confuse impact with urgency waste sprint time, a problem addressed directly in our piece on bug severity versus priority. For teams building a testing function from scratch, our overview of acceptance testing fundamentals is a reasonable place to begin.
When a team needs outside capacity to run this properly, our QA and testing services take on planning and execution without requiring a rebuilt pipeline first. Teams further along in automating checks should look at our Test Automation coverage, and larger engagements needing dedicated test leads can start with our software testing services page.